What happens to democracy when humans become less economically necessary?
A 2026 paper by Daron Acemoglu, A. Arda Gitmez and Mehdi Shadmehr, Automation and Repression, explores a mathematical mechanism linking automation, inequality, political conflict and repression. It does not predict that AI will destroy democracy. It asks what could happen under certain conditions if automation makes labor less important while capital becomes increasingly powerful.
1. The Old Bargain
Modern economies have always contained a basic bargain between capital and labor. Businesses need workers, while workers need access to productive capital. That dependence gives workers bargaining power because they can organize, negotiate wages, strike and influence politics.
Automation can weaken that relationship by reducing the extent to which production depends on human labor.
2. When Machines Replace Bargaining Power
Imagine a company that becomes enormously productive while requiring very few employees. It can generate tremendous wealth, but the workers who once possessed leverage because production depended on them may no longer have the same power.
The question therefore changes from “Will AI take jobs?” to something deeper: “What happens to political bargaining power when human labor becomes increasingly replaceable?”
3. The Democracy Problem
Workers are not only employees. They are also voters.
If automation concentrates wealth among capital owners, democratic majorities may demand redistribution. But the model shows that, under sufficiently extreme conditions, powerful capital owners can have incentives to resist redistribution and potentially support repression.
This is a theoretical mechanism, not a forecast.
4. The AGI Amplifier
AI could push automation beyond traditional factory work into coding, research, analysis, design, customer service and other cognitive tasks.
If increasingly capable AI makes a small amount of capital extraordinarily productive, ownership of AI infrastructure could become more important than ownership of traditional factories.
The danger would not necessarily be AI ruling humans. It could instead be humans using AI to increase their power over other humans.
5. The Psychology of Resignation
Political control does not always require physical repression.
A population can become economically insecure, polarized, distracted or simply convinced that collective action cannot change anything. People may remain angry while gradually losing the belief that protest, voting or organization can produce meaningful consequences.
That creates a subtler form of political weakness: awareness without agency.
6. The Paradox of Abundance
AI could also produce the opposite outcome.
If powerful AI becomes broadly accessible, individuals and small organizations could gain capabilities once available mainly to large institutions. Productivity could rise, expertise could become cheaper and ordinary people could become dramatically more capable.
The critical variable may therefore be ownership and access, not AI capability alone.
Abundance does not automatically create freedom. The crucial question is: Who controls the machines that produce the abundance?
7. The Real AGI Question
The most important question may not be whether AI destroys democracy.
It may be whether AI changes the relationship between economic usefulness and political power.
If machines can produce most of society’s economic output, humans could become freer because they no longer need to work—or less powerful because those who own the machines no longer need them.
The same technology could therefore support radically different futures.
8. The Final Question
Acemoglu’s model gives us a warning mechanism, not a prediction: automation can increase the returns to capital; concentrated capital can increase political conflict; extreme conflict can create incentives for repression.
The future depends on what institutions surround the technology.
The central question for the AGI era may therefore be:
When intelligence becomes abundant, will human beings become more powerful—or merely less necessary?
Read deatiled article below
Will AGI Let Elites Rule Forever—and Make Human Bargaining Power Disappear?