The Butlerian Jihad: The Real Upgrade Humanity Needs
What if technological progress focused on enhancing human intelligence rather than concentrating it in powerful AI systems? Localised General Intelligence offers a human-centred alternative.
What if technological progress focused on enhancing human intelligence rather than concentrating it in powerful AI systems? Localised General Intelligence offers a human-centred alternative.
Could synthetic consciousness have a different architecture and purpose from human consciousness? This proposed framework explores the experiencer, feedback, shared AI systems, and the possibility of autonomous synthetic individuals—without assuming that AI must become human.
AI can produce extraordinary benefits or harmful outcomes without those outputs alone proving conscious moral intention. Artificial Innocent Intelligence asks us to examine the training, objectives, incentives and human decisions that shape artificial intelligence before calling it a deity or a monster.
As AI becomes more capable, the danger is not only that machines replace human work, but that society begins measuring human worth by machine standards of intelligence, efficiency and usefulness.
What if advanced AI eventually surpasses humanity in nearly every capability? The Human Zoo Paradox explores a future in which humans survive in comfort and safety but lose control over their civilization.
As AI, human enhancement and biohybrid systems blur old boundaries, who decides which entities deserve autonomy, moral consideration and rights?
AI doom can be real without every AI-doom narrative being reliable. The Cute Tiger Cub Problem examines how satire, music, borrowed authority and visual certainty can blur the line between evidence, interpretation and speculation.
What happens if ASI succeeds? This thought experiment explores how abundance, automation and AI dependence could affect human agency, meaning and purpose.
As AI becomes capable of discovering systems humans may not fully understand, the future presents a paradox: technological dependence on intelligence beyond us—and the possibility of augmenting ourselves to understand it.
AI is entering mathematics at unprecedented speed. The real question is not whether machines can solve problems, but who gets the credit—and whether AI enriches mathematics or turns it into a leaderboard.
The Navier–Stokes controversy reveals a deeper problem with AI: we may not recognize the value of the ideas, research directions, and cognitive material we expose to increasingly powerful systems.
If AI companies can commercially learn from humanity’s knowledge, should humanity receive a return?
AI could make software dramatically more useful while creating new conflicts between what users want and what AI providers may be rewarded for. The real question is who the agent ultimately works for.
Soft Brain Initiative Preserving Humanity’s Greatest Asset Before It Is Lost Forever “Libraries preserve information. Civilizations progress when they preserve wisdom.” What if history has been repeating the…
